![]() ![]() A silly, but illustrative example: Government could outlaw child sacrifice, but it couldn’t blow up an entire church to stop it. prohibiting the free exercise (of religion).” The Supreme Court has interpreted that language in varying ways over our country’s existence, but by 1989, most judges saw the test as relatively clear: If government burdened someone’s exercise of their religion, it needed to show (1) that it was trying to achieve an interest of the highest order and (2) that it was taking the most narrow means possible of achieving that interest. ![]() The free exercise clause of the Constitution provides, “Congress shall make no law. Supreme Court rules for Catholic foster care agency in major religious freedom caseīefore I explain why Fulton is less than satisfying, allow me to give some brief history. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |